[Update II -- The Saga Continues] Caught Red-Handed in Violation of Both Site-Wide SaidIt Rules and Current US Law, SaidIt Admin /u/TheAmeliaMay Now Says the Rule Was Just MADE-UP... as a FAKE REASON to Ban People. (...making the excuse worse than the crime?)

submitted by Law-and-Odor from (self.SaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]specialsauces 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (8 children)

it is refreshing when i encounter someone that is crazier than myself ~ me

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I wouldn't use the word "crazy". Maybe disturbed. I got this DM from them instead of a comment reply.

Even more productive than true SaidIt journalism (not my words!) :-? Nah... not gonna let the perfect be the enemy of the good here -- and you shouldn't either. If you would like me to do something more productive on SaidIt, then tell the admins to stop banning and censoring my stuff based on their personal dislikes. Now THAT would be something truly productive... you know ...rather than bitching at the underdog here... ( ಡ,౪ ಡ )

BTW, how many subs have you created? How many subs have you moderated? How many of them featured a fully customized CSS? How many YouTube videos of your own production have you posted? Genuinely curious about your output now, Captain Productive.

I wonder why this person doesn't create their own site instead of blaming and trying to bully their will on others. Is this why the "block user" tool was created? While I disagree with some of the regulars on this site, I can still find room for their voices while reading through the posts and comments. This is one of those times when it's best to spend energy elsewhere, but I realize that it could get "messy" if Mags doesn't stay on top of this.

[–]specialsauces 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

what if there was a way to only allow newly registered users to ONLY post in the "NEW USERS SUB", until they are fully vetted and "invited" to join the site's other subs?

this would entirely kill spammers, like that douche that keeps posting those get rich quick and earn $90k/day bullshit.

also, for those that only want to be disruptive, (like me, lol) would never even make it beyond the NEW USERS SUB.

this would cut down on 99% of the bullshit.

or, m7 could just allow several of the very active normal users to quarantine disruptive users.

this is a really nice forum, if it were only managed a bit more actively, cuz its the little things that really fuck it all up.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I totally agree with free speech in a public forum, but this is a privately run site with rules set by the owner. I like the rules, but I'm not going to quit visiting when I see this kind of socially immature behavior. I understand why m7 isn't as quick to bring down the hammer, though. It would be easier to quickly boot users, but it would destroy the culture.

[–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Zapped:

Has anyone ever told you that you sound like a flaming faggot? (serious question)

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I guess your sarcasm comes across better in person.

[–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No sarcasm intended. This is a private forum. If you would like to work and play nicely with others then you are welcome to stick around and do your part.

This is entirely your decision.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ah. You're one of the alt's. I guess I am naïve.

[–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i will accept that as a truce, coming from you.

apology accepted.