you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

What are you referring to? Be specific. What "conspiracy theory" do you think I believe that isn't true?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Literally your own article. Even the title. "Jews plan to permanently silence the west". You blame the Jews for a given set of opinions and believe them to be nefarious, and have a theory that they're responsible. Hence, conspiracy theory.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Did you read the article? You can't just say "I won't believe the conclusion" and call that a refutation.

Yes, Jews (not all Jews but primarily Jews) are conspiring to subvert White countries, i.e. by flooding them with non-Whites and destroying their sense of self-preservation. That's just a fact. sorry.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

primarily Jews

[[citation needed]].

by flooding them with non-Whites and destroying their sense of self-preservation. That's just a fact. sorry.

Claiming it's true doesn't make it true. I challenged you to defend your beliefs. You've consistently failed to even make the attempt, and I refuted your conspiracy theory in the first place by pointing out plenty of other people share the ideological beliefs you ascribe to "primarily jews".

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Nope. I am not going to bother. You can either present your strongest arguments here or go away. I've already had these arguments over the past five years, as I said, and I'm not going to keep dumpster diving when all of them amount to what I already said. You invent an exclusivity when the ideas you claim Jews hold are held my far more people than there are Jews to begin with, and advocated for by them besides. It's no more sensible than the satire of it, the "Hibernian conspiracy". https://imgur.com/gallery/opBuw

[–]Fitter_Happier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Do you think if Jews were against mass migration and for preserving Whites' supermajority status in White countries it would be happening, given their influence in Hollywood, publishing, magazines, television, etc.? Do you? Honestly?

Yes, big business wants more people to raise the GDP because they make more money, but that's always been the case but they were kept in check by public opinion, but public opinion has been hijacked by Jews who fear WHITE SUPREEEEEEMACISTS!!!!!, so every fucking time someone suggests curtailing immigration the Jews trot out (((Anne Frank))) and Hitler. But this is so fucking obvious I don't know why I'm wasting my breath.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Because it isn't "the jews". It's some jews, and a whole bunch of other people that outnumber them. You think everyone in Hollywood is jewish? EVERYONE in the media? Or did you just find a single Jewish name on a board of directors and conclude that one person magically controls all of it? As I already said, and as a central refutation of this conspiracy theory, the number of people who agree already with the things you attribute to Jews outnumber the entire Jewish population.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You think everyone in Hollywood is jewish? EVERYONE in the media?

You're trying to tell me Jews don't run Hollywood and the MSM? Next thing you're going to tell me La Cosa Nostra isn't an Italian thing, I mean most Italians are not in the mafia.

single Jewish name on a board of directors

You're not even trying now.

Who runs Hollywood? C'mon, By JOEL STEIN, LA Times

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

And so you link to an article literally doing what I'd said you'd do. You find a couple of Jewish names, or people from wealthy Jewish families, and completely ignore that these organizations are staffed and run by so many non-jews as to easily outnumber them hundreds to one. Thank you for proving my point. All you have is a conspiracy theory that somehow requires Jews have either mind control powers or a truly mystical ability to persuade people to agree to everything they say. Do you realize how ridiculous your ideas are?

(Even better still, Joel Stein writes satire)

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dumpster dive here:

https://cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

Here's an excerpt:

We need to rescue it from the influence of those who understand America not in terms of its abstract constitutional principles, not as embodied in the Bill of Rights, but rather in some Buchananite version of blut un boden. It was recently reported in the Tennessean that Buchanan's Reform Party has, unsurprisingly enough, made all-out anti-immigration a central plank of its platform, calling for a 10-year moratorium on all immigration. It must be admitted that this attitude clearly resonates with a majority of Americans. Every time representative samples of Americans are presented this option on opinion surveys of all sorts they support it, though usually it is couched in the context of a five-year moratorium. We are not advocating surrender to the thoughtless mob, but we are advocating the design of policy closer to where the American people actually are with regard to the issue, at the same time that we morally educate them to extend the parameters of their sense of community. Here is a good role for the church.