The same people who say we need to "stop with the anti-semitism" are the same ones who will support anti-White rhetoric as free speech

submitted by EuropeanAwakening from (self.SaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The virus has already killed a quarter of a percent of NYC residents, over six times her claimed 0.04% fatality rate.

Every death is being documented as a covid death if the person "tests positive" using the fraudulent "tests".

Here's the official National Vital Statistics Services April 2020 Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19)

See paragraphs 5 & 6 where they provide coroners with the new reporting requirements.

This section on the death certificate is for reporting the sequence of conditions that led directly to death. The immediate cause of death, which is the disease or condition that directly preceded death and is not necessarily the underlying cause of death (UCOD), should be reported on line a. The conditions that led to the immediate cause of death should be reported in a logical sequence in terms of time and etiology below it.

The UCOD, which is “(a) the disease or injury which initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to death or (b) the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury” (7), should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I.

So... if a swimmer is eaten by a shark, and the arm that is recovered tests positive for covid; then put Coco19 on line 1, and shark attack on line 2...

It's a hoax.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So... if a swimmer is eaten by a shark, and the arm that is recovered tests positive for covid; then put Coco19 on line 1, and shark attack on line 2... No you're just not understanding what you're reading. At all. They even give multiple of how it's supposed to be written. The immediate causes listed in the examples are Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Acute respiratory acidosis, and acute respiratory illness, all of which mean they died because they couldn't fucking breathe.

COVID-19 is listed as the underlying cause, or one of the underlying causes, when it's determined that's what made it so that they couldn't fucking breathe. No, COVID-19 is not listed as the immediate cause of death, and it's certainly not going to be listed as the cause of death if you get eaten by a fucking shark. Try actually reading it next time.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Try actually reading it next time.

The direct quote from the document was included in the comment. Review the document yourself at the official CDC.gov site:

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

It's explicitly states:

the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury” (7), should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I.

The shark attack is "the accident or violence" so it is now considered secondary. This reporting change was made in April.

Every Coco death since April is questionable, at best.

Here's a local news report from a Florida station.

Man Dies in Motorcycle Fatality but Listed as BS-19 Death

The reporting system for fatalities has worked quite well, for many decades.

If the pandemic was a real and deadly epidemic, then there would be no reason to modify the reporting method.

But they changed it in April, because people weren't dying from it.

It's a hoax.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The motorcycle death is a clerical error, not evidence of a hoax.

But sure, basically every developed country, including enemy countries, are colluding with each other to fake these cases and death numbers because wanting to shut down the economy makes so much sense.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Was the Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) at the CDC website a clerical error?

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

I'm sure you're a coincidence theorist, so these clerical errors just seem to be popping up everywhere.

What are the odds???

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Man this guy is a hoot to read! Very amusing!

You know, we should have more than a "friends" list: I vote we get a "Posts ridiculous BS" list and a "Opposite views" list. One for when I feel like laughing, and one when I feel confrontational.

But thank you FediNetizen, you have been most helpful in lifting my spirits with a good-hearted laugh at your coincidentalism.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's bad comedy....

Brought to Saidit by the tax dodging "charitable donations" from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation(s). :-/

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I shouldn't laugh. Between trolls and the cyberattacks, Saidit appears to be threatened.