Can we do something about the political bots?

submitted by Tarrock from (self.SaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

People aren't "shilling" because they disagree with you.

Yeah, I know. He's a shill, because he's here with an agenda.

He's almost certainly a Zionist shill, because he's motivated to detract attention away from https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/45wr/israel_did_911/, the content behind each of the links is concise, and factual. The evidence is overwhelming; if you have the intellectual honesty to look past the propaganda.

Chipshit used the go-to shill response that works so well on Reddit, because your not allowed to call them out there.

Ineffective persuasion. Mystery links, no clue as to what they are, no discussion.

It's an attempt to dishonestly discourage people from looking into the actual evidence.

You should look at the evidence and decide for yourself.

Edit: fixed misquote.

/U/dark_devil_dd are you in opposition to 9/11 Truth?

Do you have a reason to think Chipshit isn't a shill?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

1st of all, can you fix the quote so it doesn't appear like I'm saying something I'm not?

He's almost certainly a Zionist shill, because he's motivated to detract attention away from https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/45wr/israel_did_911/, the content behind each of the links is concise, and factual. The evidence is overwhelming; if you have the intellectual honesty to look past the propaganda.

That's your opinion. In that thread shortened link are used, I see no reason to do so on saidit, it only serves to obscure the source of the information. I too often have seen l shortened link being used for nefarious purposes, like virus spreading and spam. I discourage people from clicking on them and I don't think they should be allowed on saidit, however that's up to u/magnora7 .

if you have the intellectual honesty to look past the propaganda.

I believe it's called "poisoning the well", equivalent to "either agree with me or you're these awful things" which is not relevant to demonstrate the factuality of the claims, and most people would more likely think it's the other way around, that it's people who say Israel did 911 that are embracing propaganda. Is that really the standard of discussion you want to promote?

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

He asked you direct questions, you do not answer and nitpick him in 3 different ways, which are ad hom attacks.

That is not what poisoning the well is, it is not equivalent to "agree with me or you are awful", that is a litmus test.

Poisoning the well is literally what chipit did, was top/first poster and threw shit on the entire concept of the post. I know this very well, check out my journal at soylentnews.org, and every comment I make at voat, and many comments I make here. It is why I rely primarily on a static site to express myself, I am followed everywhere I go on the internet by these fake stooges who get paid to ruin the internet.

Poisoning the well is the #1 strategy of shills, misdirect the entire discussion, and that is also what you are doing here ITT.

If you are unaware of that, you should know you look silly and fake, at the very best. At least we know very powerful people are bothered by what we are doing here, so that is some sign we are being effective.

But when you are fighting people with unlimited money, who literally and figuratively print money, of course they can hire some sociopaths to spew degenerate garbage.

That is why I made this meme: https://archive.ph/EdHYz

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

He asked you direct questions, you do not answer and nitpick him in 3 different ways, which are ad hom attacks.

Dude, you obviously have no idea what ad hominem mean...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Poisoning the well is literally what chipit did, was top/first poster and threw shit on the entire concept of the post.

That's not what poisoning the well means either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well

Maybe you should learn what things mean before you attack people.

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Um yes ad hominem is a personal attack and that is what you did, and poisoning the well is ensuring the first rounds of debate are misdirected, both supported by both of those articles, so you are just here to bicker and slide the thread.

Nor did I attack you, so thats 3 major manipulations, on top of everything else youve said in this thread which is equally without merit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Dude, those things are only in your head.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Have you ever heard of ShareBlue? If not, you should look it up, its' tactics, as well as its' relation to George Soros. Even David Brock if you're feeling like drawing dots.

Edit: You may find this interesting - https://www.reddit.com/r/bestof/comments/7fc70o/reddit_shill_explains_how_theyre_paid_to/

https://np.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/31wo57/the_chevron_tapes_video_shows_oil_giant_allegedly/cq5uhse/

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks for the backup!

And he went to "take your meds schizo" as if on que...

THAT is a shill right there.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Another good one for you to share with people who say this isn't a real phenomena:

https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1053&context=isw

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice! Thanks!

Will use this for sure.