you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Women have babies. That’s their value. They are ovens with the food allready inside. The human population can carry on with lots of women, and few men, but if only one woman is left over, and several thousand men, we are in a pickle.

For example, look at a lion pack. One male for 10a of females. Men are not necessary, at all.

Imagine a women, who is worthless, no job, drug addict. She still has value. Ugly, still has value. Stupid, still has value. Whore, still has value.

Men on the other hand, we are worth nothing and can easily be replaced, we must work. We must accomplish something. It is a tough pill for lots of men to swallow. Especially men raised without dads in the house hold.

It’s horrible man, but it’s the truth.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I agree with what you say, but not the interpretation. Women are how we propagate our society, they're integral to the process.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yea.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So they're important. We just fucked up with this equality shit, trying to make women and men interchangable and not recognizing their differences -- so industry could have a larger, cheaper pool of workers.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Come on, wake up. We need to fight nature where it needs remedied. You're trying to put a bow tie on a pig. Honestly the gnostics were pretty much right about the flesh and nature, it's almost never a good thing.