you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

Women have babies. That’s their value. They are ovens with the food allready inside. The human population can carry on with lots of women, and few men, but if only one woman is left over, and several thousand men, we are in a pickle.

For example, look at a lion pack. One male for 10a of females. Men are not necessary, at all.

Imagine a women, who is worthless, no job, drug addict. She still has value. Ugly, still has value. Stupid, still has value. Whore, still has value.

Men on the other hand, we are worth nothing and can easily be replaced, we must work. We must accomplish something. It is a tough pill for lots of men to swallow. Especially men raised without dads in the house hold.

It’s horrible man, but it’s the truth.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You are right, it is basic biological fact that a single man can impregnate many many females in the 9 months it takes a single female to gestate a baby. In terms of species survival, men are indeed far more expendable than women, and that is bound to be reflected in the dynamics of sexual selection as humans are biological animals, whether we want to admit that or not. Now whether this means 'all foids are inherently wicked' as some here say, I am not convinced. I don't blame anyone for biology, but I do think this group often makes very fair points about the inequity of these dynamics and it makes for interesting discussions

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We actually had a pretty for society.

I’m not going full incel. I’m pointing out that the incel community has issues processing inequalities between the sexes.

They are focusing on the issue, and not the solution. It seems like we had a good thing when men were forced to marry what they impregnated.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just like 99% of problems, there is no solution.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't blame anyone for biology either. But they should not be taking its side, and things like this are a perfect example of why. Yet 99.99% of people do. Either by trying to cover up its wickedness or turning to toxic positivity (liberals) or as a last resort calling good evil and evil good (trads). Both massive copes, leading to even more bad things and censorship and persecutions.

The gnostics were right, the very nature of this existence is bad.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I agree with what you say, but not the interpretation. Women are how we propagate our society, they're integral to the process.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yea.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So they're important. We just fucked up with this equality shit, trying to make women and men interchangable and not recognizing their differences -- so industry could have a larger, cheaper pool of workers.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Come on, wake up. We need to fight nature where it needs remedied. You're trying to put a bow tie on a pig. Honestly the gnostics were pretty much right about the flesh and nature, it's almost never a good thing.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Toxic positivity won't hear you. The gnostics had it right, we're in a mind torture matrix. Avoid the white light trap and any afterlife fairy tales you're presented with, stop reincarnating. The world is a terrible place. Women usually have their own problems, but the matrix is set up so we're all as envious as possible.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Hey vulptex. What’s toxic positivity?

Gnostic makes the most sense to me.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Toxic positivity is denial that bad truly exists. They'll say it all has some grander purpose for good, like "earth is a school", or they'll blame it on some boogeyman, such as conservatives. They will shove "positive thinking" in your face and scream at you if you acknowledge anything negative and go against their fairy tale of a benevolent world that's all sunshine and rainbows.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is that similar to the denial of cynicism or nilhism?

I have not heard that term before. I see something similar in the incel community. I appreciate you sharing.

Often, ignorance is bliss. So too is optimism.

[–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Optimism requires ignorance. Lots of it.