you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Technophobia

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technophobia

I think that "robot rights" is a distraction. The real fight has already been lost (or was never seriously resisted), but it could be resumed.

Corporations will be the instruments that are used to define and push legislation for "robot rights" (and for much worse).

The legal bedrock of the NWO (and the current world order) is CORPORATE PERSONHOOD.

Corporations are legal fictions. InCOPOREAL concepts/ideas; made with fraudulent legal instruments.

This foundation is on unstable legal footing, as it was never approved by any legislation, and was backdoored as a legal footnote (which has remained largely unchallenged).

If I was a social billionaire (50 million could potentially be adequate for legal expenses, the rest for grassroots PR and bodyguards) who wanted to make a name in world history for all time, then this would be a credible strategy.

If this feat was pulled off, then every person world be legally personally accountable for their actions.

No more executives hiding behind hired managers to take the fall for them. No motivation for robot rights.

Actual justice for humanity.

I'm going if in a tangent from the stated question, because I don't think the robot rights fight can be won until corporate interests are subverted to human interests.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Technophobia is too broad, and reminds me of the UniBomber. Robophobia is better. I don't know why I didn't think of it.

I'd vote for "Robot Rights" if I didn't think voting was a rigged joke and if human rights were actually respected and upheld and there was any decent justice anywhere on Earth. For now I can only assume that "Robots Rights" may be the "Carbon Tax" scam of the future.

Concepts/ideas; made with fraudulent legal instruments.

Fictional concepts upon fictional concepts into a matrix of rigged systems.

Bodyguards can't protect you from aircraft failures or "gas leaks".

This would be a credible strategy.

What would?

I don't think the robot rights fight can be won until corporate interests are subverted to human interests.

I completely agree. My /s/BittersweetSeeds story is the only outside chance scenario I can possibly imagine.