you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

That's merely contradiction, not argument. The other guy that operates this social media influencer account was much better than you. I mean, seriously, the guilt by association fallacy?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Socks is right. AOC did something that at least virtue signaled a statement positive for the middle and lower classes. The question is why her campaign managers are Zionists and she changed her stance on Israel completely; made a pledge to that crap terrorist state, and NEVER talks about capital tax, the only tax worth implementing on the rich.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

AOC did something that at least virtue signaled a statement positive for the middle and lower classes.

Bullshit. False advertising for false hope in fake leadership for empty promises and no action.

I'd take the ugliest truth over the sexiest lie any day. Fuck virtue signalling - give us real virtue and ACTION.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you're making this up as well? The contradiction is the "no", OK? The argument is what follows the contradiction.