all 58 comments

[–]noxwaste 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (4 children)

Has anyone found nudes of her yet?

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Check the nearest stable.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'd settle for decent fakes.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Asshole

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You can tell the other guy got off work and a new voice is operating the socks account. Insults aren't arguments, they're a sign you have none. They are also a Saidit TOS violation.

[–]FlippyKing 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

AOPeloSi is essentially one part spokesmodel and one part sheepdog, keeping any potentially rebellious individuals in the party faithful to the party.

It's the same way some held out hope that Kucinich was somehow going to lead the party in the right direction, or that Bernie was actually trying to win something other than his own comfort. That young Bernie might not recognize old Bernie is not a knock on young Bernie, it's just how effectively power really does corrupt. Bakunin told us all about it long ago.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

This doesn't make sense.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

In what way? Give details.

[–]Yin 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

socks trolls to provoke a reaction from people to expend their energy. These trolls deserve no more than 1 or 2 words of one's time.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Well also Socks has crushes on certain women and overreacts when anyone has a simple opinion about one of them.

They aren't trolling here, they are losing it because their imaginary wifey is being slighted.

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

That makes sense. Keeping globalist-communist retards as waifus must be very stressful.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You three should get a room. (It's also OK to support pro-democracy progressives on Saidit. That's not provoking a reaction.)

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You should get a room.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Rubber padded room.

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

You read my mind: (padded) room.

[–]Yin 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

I wonder how many who grew up reading "Hunger Games" understand this is the Hollywood villain class functioning to glamorize globalist tyranny, now with accelerated medical tyranny and mandated injections.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No - Yin - we don't compare reality with a stupid movie. Grow up.

[–]Yin 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Stop trolling.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Look up the definition of 'troll'

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Stop trolling.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So - you've read the definition and now you're trolling?

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (24 children)

The funniest thing is that she claimed it was courage to wear it.

Then two or three other people turned up wearing much the same thing.

Fashionable luxury beliefs which cost the holder nothing to promote. If anything they help people like AOC climb the greasy pole.

Also

http://imgur.com/a/DKbxky3

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (11 children)

The real hard left move would have been to join the protesters outside the event. Or simply refuse to attend at all, and issue a statement condemning the pedophile billionaires in attendance. But she won't do that because she's a corrupt phony.

"social democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism"

[–]VirgilGriff 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

She wouldn't do that because she's a woman and loves attention and status

FTFY

[–]socks 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Bullshit

[–]VirgilGriff 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

lol yes, AOC hates attention and hates status. Like 99% of women. They hate status and hate getting attention.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Completely irrelevant. She's done nothing wrong. Meanwhile, hundreds of other congresspeople who do nothing aren't getting this idiotic response about: ooooh - he LOVES attention - look at him....

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

She did nothing wrong? A socialist that attended an event for elites? Which costs $30k/ticket?

A socialist who claimed that we should eat the rich. That it's wrong to have an elite class and a plebian class. Goes to an event for elites instead of joining the other poor people outside protesting the event.

That's not wrong to you?

Lick more boot.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Bullshit

All you say is "Bullshit". At least this one is short and honest.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

But she won't do that because she's a corrupt phony.

Exactly, but liberals are infatuated with her. The elites picked her for good reason. She has the liberal masses bamboozled.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So what? She made an important statement, in a room of rich people. We should tax the rich. Noting that she could have done something else is missing the point.

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

What important statement? One that pretty much everyone agrees with?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mine as well not say it at all and believe Tucker Cuckson.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mine as well not say it at all and believe Tucker Cuckoos.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

At least she's made a good argument on the dress. Yes, that did require courage.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

No argument was made in the dress.

It's a slogan.

An argument would be "the rich should be taxed because ..."

Really Socks you are fast losing what brains you had. Forcing yourself to believe lies to justify your existence or to fit in with your lefty friends is never going to work out well for you mentally.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A++

[–]socks 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Some of the worst kinds of people are those who think they're so smart when they aren't.

Your comments take everything out of context, as if you have no idea where she was, what the Gala was for, the rare tradition of making a political statement with a dress, and so much more about the context. If you wore the dress, would that be an argument? Not really, because you're an anonymous online person. It's a slogan if you wear it.

If a politician wears that dress in a room of rich people, that is an argument. Do you understand?

The person, the dress, the statement on the expensive dress, the rich people at the Gala, the publicity for it, the history of political statements at Galas, the fact that this is a fundraiser, the need for rich people to pay a fair share of taxes (which some rich people agree with), and so much more make this 'event' of her's and the dress at the Gala an argument.

And you are definitely in no position to determine who has "brains" and who doesn't. If you were a zombie, you'd starve.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Some of the worst kinds of people are those who think they're so smart when they aren't.

Just like a vampire who wouldn't recognize himself in a mirror if he had a soul or reflection.

The dress is a perfect example of the fake-progressives saying the correct words but never actually taking action.

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Courage would have been wearing an openly pro-American dress. She would have been thrown out of the event. But this virtue signalling? Fit right in. Everyone knew it was theater. AOC is a fraud. What happened to force the vote? AOC showed courage by standing up to the little people and bravely going along with Pelosi. Stunning and brave!

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Courage would have been wearing an openly pro-American dress.

No - not at all

She would have been thrown out of the event.

No - not even.

But this virtue signalling?

No - It's POLITICS - the rich should pay taxes

Fit right in.

No - she didn't - around the rich people: that's the point!

Everyone knew it was theater.

Of course - for everyone and what they wore. Do you know anything about Galas?

AOC is a fraud.

Certainly not.

What happened to force the vote?

Not related to the Gala

AOC showed courage by standing up to the little people

No - they're not little people

and bravely going along with Pelosi.

No - it's politics

Stunning and brave!

No - it's her job

All of these points are really strange, as if they copied a Fox News broadcast. They're also all wrong.

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

That's merely contradiction, not argument. The other guy that operates this social media influencer account was much better than you. I mean, seriously, the guilt by association fallacy?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Socks is right. AOC did something that at least virtue signaled a statement positive for the middle and lower classes. The question is why her campaign managers are Zionists and she changed her stance on Israel completely; made a pledge to that crap terrorist state, and NEVER talks about capital tax, the only tax worth implementing on the rich.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

AOC did something that at least virtue signaled a statement positive for the middle and lower classes.

Bullshit. False advertising for false hope in fake leadership for empty promises and no action.

I'd take the ugliest truth over the sexiest lie any day. Fuck virtue signalling - give us real virtue and ACTION.

[–]socks 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you're making this up as well? The contradiction is the "no", OK? The argument is what follows the contradiction.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I think many of us here are skeptical of AOC's intentions with this kind of stunt and her use of this slogan. I notice she's been adding this onto her twitter posts as well. Does she actually want to tax the rich or is this just a liberal grandstanding? AOC seems to be an agent for the rich and created by the rich. I'm not convinced this is anything more than a ruse.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Tax the rich" is code for tax middle class white people. #knowthecode

[–]ShalomEveryone 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

What's the big deal? Invited guests get to attend for free, AOC was a guest. AOC picked the perfect place to wear her dress about taxing rich people to get her message out. Where should AOC wear that dress, at a homeless shelter?

Shalom

✡️️

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

This sock puppet account always posts in defense of the hard left.

[–]socks 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No - Chipit - he's wondering about the topic of the post, not about the damage to your ego when someone disagrees with you. Grow up.

[–]ShalomEveryone 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Those on the right are the most sensitive people on the internet. They talk tough in their little echo chambers. Someone voices another opinion their feelings are hurt and then they go on the attack to feel better about themselves.

Shalom

✡️️

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

What you just said does not apply to just the right. It's the left, the authoritarians, the centrists, and the anarchists too.

[–]ShalomEveryone 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I stand by what I said. Those on the right are the loudest, brigading, tough talking shit talkers out there. Others on the political spectrum don't act as bad as those on the right.

Shalom

✡️️

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Not even SJWs? Gimme a break.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Do or do not. There is no message out.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

All I want for Christmas is her two front teeth.