you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]0_0 11 insightful - 8 fun11 insightful - 7 fun12 insightful - 8 fun -  (7 children)

Just look at this power jannie complaining about a proposed limit of 3 default subs per mod. These people are disgusting.

[–]RedItBurn 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

lol. "A better place" Sure bud. Got to make sure the "vaccine" injured, evil drumf supporters, and free speech corrupters can't speak.

[–]Zednix 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Jesus fucking christ what a loser

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Is there a limit of default subs a user can mod?

[–]Vulptex[S,A] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There's a limit of 40 subs period.

[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ok a user can mod 40 subs... but they can also mod 40 default subs?

[–]Vulptex[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That rule was made before default subs were a thing. But the owner is the top mod of pretty much all of them. He did add a couple other admins as mods for some reason, I don't know why. One of them doesn't like to log in to admin mode for some reason, so in his case that's probably why.