you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]happysmash27 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The way I read it:

Blue = Jewish

Red = Non-Jewish European

Green = African

I think this is the case, because there are ideologies that view each of these groups exactly the same as the blue, red, and green groups in the hypothetical.

I am not from that ideology, so my question is why the Blue group would want to concentrate more power in Blue people in the first place. And if this really is a genetic-level thing, how does it account for Blue people that don't agree with the Blue agenda, or who don't know about it?

I also don't necessarily agree with the claims on intelligence, if this theory that the colours are based on race is correct. One's environment can affect intelligence a lot, especially if one does not have enough food in childhood, so if there are disparities in intelligence between groups, it may also be based on disparities in environment or even epigenetics that diminish in effect over time if the environment is continuously good, therefore be nullified when groups are mixed together enough, and have the same pro-intelligence environment for long periods of time.

[–]oneinchterror 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As for why the blues want to concentrate power amongst themselves, why exactly wouldn't they? Though genetics can and do play a role, their particular religion (and more broadly, their entire moral system and outlook on life, even when divorced from the supernatural) is unique to their group. Worshippers of the Red faith and those who ascribe to Bluedaism had many contentious periods throughout history because fundamentally, they are different people who have different (often irreconcilable) views about how society should be. This is where the Blueish Question comes into the picture.

Regarding intelligence, you have to understand that IQ (or "g" for "general intelligence") is THE gold standard for psychological concepts. Nothing else in the field of psychology is as substantive, predictive, or replicable as IQ testing. I'll drop the silly color scheming and just say, the US has collected over 100 years of extremely robust data on intelligence, and it has been conclusively shown that there is a roughly ~15 point IQ gap between the average IQ of blacks and whites (~85 & ~100, respectively). This gap persists across all SES brackets (which would not be the case were the gap simply due to environment). In fact, it's thought that IQ is potentially >80% heritable in adulthood. That is a huge deal, and completely blows blank slatist egalitarians - and really, the whole leftist paradigm - out of the water. It's exactly why they are so quick to deplatform and cancel anyone who dares discuss or research the relationship between human genetics and intelligence, such as Nobel Laureate James Watson, or more recently Dr. Stephen Hsu.

[–][deleted] 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What about K and R genetics?