How Reddit Was Destroyed

submitted by Robin from wikispooks.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

You also have to understand why the internet was dis empowered so. Various protests like Occupy Wall-street and Middle eastern protests against authoritarian regimes were aided by internet communication. Its why all the respective states began to employ disruptions across the board on these networks. The end game of the state is to keep enabling the few in power and keeping containment on the masses which they will continue to do so because its default human behavior uncorrected.

At this point, the state has enabled a quasi-fascist movement attempting to take off from the internet via right wing authoritarianism but it too doesn't have much merit in the wild, since it is doomed to fail. The proper address to systemic issues is not happening in a balanced manner; so this reactionary environment will lead to further sabotage of the state and all executives involved. Grab some popcorn

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It sounds like you are siding with the state, and advocating support for censorship.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Nope. Not even if your life depended on it!

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Come on "Issues7" AKA [deleted].

It's obvious.

Give it a rest.

[deleted], at this point I sometimes recommend starting over with a new account, but you already have.
;-)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm still here :)

But if you think its that obvious, then you might just be clueless.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Really??? That's interesting.

So you like to follow up other people's responses and explain their thought process for them?

You said:.

[Deleted] I cannot underestimate! Edit: The internet is already d00m'd!

I responded:.

Are you referring to Chipit/Snow the shill, and suggesting that people don't notice/care?

Or referring to the astroturfing of sites and ads for propaganda/profit? I agree that this is a problem.

Then you came back with this gem:

Issues7: I am referring to all of the above. There is a basic turing test that bots can pass when interacting with humans.... (Blah blah)

BUSTED!

It's also hilarious that you are attempting to shill an AI Turing test bot from a new account, on a post about site subversion and shilling.

You utterly botched it.

You must be going trying to win a worst shill award.

At least the Chipit/Snow shill made me look into the facts.

You win the award for most foolish shilling. This is disgraceful. :-)

You made my day.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm glad you found your conclusions that made your day. But you did make an error in attempting to copy my reply.

You said:. [Deleted] I cannot underestimate! Edit: The internet is already d00m'd!

I never said I. But the internet is d00m'd and what lurks on the internet shouldn't be underestimated. So are you attempting to conclude that I am a bot? Well you have no way of knowing.

And how exactly am I a shill?

My intention would be to tear down hive bubbles in an attempt to push for further clarity. If that is left wing stuff, so be it. If it is right wring stuff, so be it.

Maybe you are a protector of the veil but I'm not :)

So call and consider me whatever you want. I'm here for my own reasons- botched or not.