Taking Wealth From Those Who Work Hard

submitted by EndlessSunflowers from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Under anarchy the small will be eaten by the big. The worker owned will be out competed, and destroyed by the top down run competition because it is far more efficient. Under monarchy it is whatever the king wants. If you have a good king you are golden, but if you have shit king it is the same as communism. The king and his court own everything, it differs from communism only in name and propaganda. Capitalism is the only way.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Anarchy implies no state corporation. Anarchy can work if Christ and his principals are met. Any ism can work under Christ accept Marxist Leninism w/ Militant Atheism.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Anarchy is an unstable power vacuum. The strong will always conquer the weak. Anarchists want to twist their system into something that approximates democracy, but they don't want to call it democracy because they want to pretend they invented something new.

What anarchy actually means is that there is no law that I have to follow if I don't want to follow it. It relies on voluntary cooperation. As soon as you bring up all the ways in which people can benefit by not cooperating the non aggression principal goes out the window and suddenly they invent some kind of pseudo government to take care of the problem. But because it is a "democratic" government that makes it different. The cognitive dissonance is amazing.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are at this moment unincorporated towns in the US doing quote well... even using their own local currency. There is indeed an absence of the state corporation.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And I'm sure they are over 90% white and very small. The whole thing collapses when you get people trying to take advantage.

Why do you think all the "disenfranchised" people suffering under capitalism aren't flocking over there? Why should anyone who doesn't want to go live over there be forced to live like that?

No one has a problem with you making wild claims about your system if all you want is to go live your own way on your own land. But you on the other hand have a problem with me wanting to live my own way on mine. So much for non aggression. There is a reason capitalist cities don't exist in Venezuela. There is a reason Hong Kong is the wealthiest, most desirable place to live in all of China and why the Communist party will destroy it just as soon as the treaty expires.