all 4 comments

[–]JulienMayfair 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The basic attitude of Queer Theory was always that of oppositional defiance, so it's hard to find any principle in it to use as a point of reference for a boundary that should not be transgressed when questioning and transgressing sexual norms is its central project. Queer Theory is automatically on the side of any marginalized/minority sexual proclivity.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's tough to argue with these people because you never know where they fall in their own ideology. Even in this case you have people who:

1 don't believe pedophilia exists in their ideology and will deny it as a right wing conspiracy etc... This person clearly seemed to be in that camp.

2 just use the "No true transman (Scotsman)" fallacy. Basically they say x y z doesn't happen and if it does then they aren't actually QT+. CNN basically just did this with the Colorado shooter after he said he was enby.

3 claim it's just an intellectual or academic exercise.

4 use postmodernism to deconstruct the concept of adult consent. The idea of informed consent goes hand in hand with this when they give hormones to minors.

5 are actually just fetishists of some kind and use queer theory as a means to arrive at the preconceived outcome.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.