you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HelloMomo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I guess I just find it hard to imagine that there are many landlords like that. In the field of capitalism, the fact that someone has money and is willing to pay usually outweighs personal moral quandaries. In order for this issue to actually hurt people's ability to live in an area, it would have to be a majority of landlords doing this, not just one or two. Like, if homophobia was more powerful than capitalism? I could respect that after some fashion. But I don't think that's the world we live in. While I know personal incredulity is not a real argument, that just seems unlikely to me.

[–]reluctant_commenter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In order for this issue to actually hurt people's ability to live in an area, it would have to be a majority of landlords doing this, not just one or two.

I think in certain regions, that actually may be the case. If we're averaging over the entire US, probably not; but in certain counties or states, yeah, I do believe it could make a difference. And even if it's rare for an area to have zero landlords willing to take a same-sex couple as renters, having like half or even a quarter or 10% of landlords in an area being like that would still lead to that couple expending more energy than an opposite-sex couple just to find housing.

While I know personal incredulity is not a real argument, that just seems unlikely to me.

Honestly, it would be ideal to have some data on the extent of the issue but I haven't done enough reading about this area to know. If I get a chance, I'll look into it.