you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ElectraHeart 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I looked up the creator of the show/comic and was thoroughly unsurprised to find that it's a woman who identifies as "aromantic asexual" and uses she/they pronouns. If she doesn't like boys or romance or sex, why did she create a story about gay boys falling in love!?

Its similar to Becky Albertelli coming out as bi to avoid being accused of "cishet women writing about gay men" even though being a bi woman is not any different than being a straight women and writing gays. But in the brainrot the cult experiences, being part of the cult is enough to be its priests. Call this a hot take, but i do not believe in aromantic asexuals and sort. I believe that we all have sexual orientations, regardless of having sex or not. I'm rather judgin her as I do the yaoi addicts, but with a different outcome. She rejects sex with the heterosexual men, whom she is attracted to, but also despise. Hence she can project her fantasies about heterosexual men to gay men. Romance is not something you can make the crux point of your book, without actually experiencing it.

As I said, I stopped watching the show after five minutes, so I don't actually know what happens. But I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that it presents a totally neutered version of homosexuality where the gays are more like cutesy puppy dogs than actual human beings.

I have no issue with this, when gay people write it. Glee in season two was amazing and lighthearted. I was 15 when i first watched it and always dreamed of a boyfriend like Blaine (which i got!). Growing up in a wildly homophobic country, Klaine was my hopes and dreams for the future. [And i'm forever angry to Ryan Murphy for bullying Chris Colfer!] So even though I despise the cult for their indoctrination of gay youth with their ideology, i'd rather want them to watch Heartstopper instead of Euphoria. Thats the thing, gay kids need to see cutesy stories. I hate this on the other hand. It leads to gays being treated like puppy dogs, as you said. There exists a generation of heterosexual young adults who have no idea how gay people work, except what they've seen on TV.

Y'know, the sort of thing a straight girl would write because she has literally no idea what it means to be gay or a man. If you've seen it, tell me if I'm wrong.

You're right. Remember when gendies bullied Malulani Moreno, a pacific-islander gay men for some gendie crap they pulled and got his book retracted? There is a reason why gay men are not writing romance books anymore.

I'm so tired...

Its always okay to take some time off, and focus on things you enjoy. This is not a blizzard, this is a long winter. As diva Gloria Gaynor said, we will survive.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

i do not believe in aromantic asexuals

Same. I don't think it's a coincidence that all of these 'asexuals' have anxiety disorders and/or autism. I'm not saying that to be mean, it's just blatantly obvious that there's something else going on with these people.

gay kids need to see cutesy stories

Shelter was that for me. A heartwarming, if unrealistic, story of two men falling in love and living happily ever after. I want more stories like that, innocent and cute and silly, just not from straight girls who treat us like pets. Hyper-sexualization of gay people can also be a problem, and tiresome. I'd like to see gay people on TV doing something other than falling in love or having sex.

Its always okay to take some time off, and focus on things you enjoy.

That's getting harder by the day, though. The world's gone insane. I feel like everyone has joined a cult but me.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thats the thing, gay kids need to see cutesy stories. I hate this on the other hand. It leads to gays being treated like puppy dogs, as you said. There exists a generation of heterosexual young adults who have no idea how gay people work, except what they've seen on TV.

I think this wouldn't be a problem if... there were a diversity of gay characters in media, you know? Different kinds of personalities/types in different genres. The way that you see straight people represented. And the same for lesbian and bisexual characters. There's a place for cute, sweet stories; they just can't be the ONLY stories. And, crucially, gay characters/stories can't always be created by and for NON-GAY PEOPLE. That seems to be a BIG problem right now-- when gay people (particularly the younger ones, who are still learning what it is to be gay) see their sexuality reflected in media, it's all too often not only through a heterosexual lens, it really isn't even MEANT for a gay audience. That's the TQ+ mentality in a nutshell, I guess: straight people re-writing LGB experience to cater to themselves. Straightwashing it. They've gotta learn what the fuck "stay in your lane" means.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Different kinds of personalities/types in different genres.

Lesbian Jedi, Gay Indiana Jones, Bi James Bond.

I would love to see it.