you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[removed]

    [–]7874 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Just because you want a sexual partner doesn't mean you should have one, and it definitely doesn't mean you're mature enough to understand what that means and the potential consequences of a sexual relationship, especially at such a young age where even if you've been through puberty, many of your peers are prepubertal and attempting to penetrate a prepubertal girl is akin to torture. Some kids that age are feeling sexual arousal and for some it's still too early.

    And "polyamorous" isn't a biological identity like being homosexual. Feeling attraction to multiple people at once is normal.

    And I've been trying to be neutral, but you honestly burned my eyes. Your maternal great-grandmother had your grandmother at 14, meaning she was most likely pregnant at 13. The thought of that makes me sick. It's extremely easy for kids that age to die from pregnancy because their bodies aren't ready for childbirth; even though they've been through puberty, they're still growing at that age.

    Girls hitting puberty so early is likely not even natural and a consequence of estrogen (from animal agriculture) in the water supply.

    Every single whim shouldn't be indulged, especially when the whims are sexual and the people are children.

    [–]GreykittymommaMagical lady 💜 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Thank you, that previous comment was very, very creepy.

    No, 10-14 year olds shouldn't have sex. Ever. There, I said it. Lock me up now for repressing their baby kink. BARF.

    "Don't worry, another stupid kid is trying to fuck your kid." Somehow that's not much better than an adult doing it except the adult should know better. A "kid" can still give my kid an std or get her pregnant. Or ya know, RAPE her.

    Just fucking gross all around.

    [–]our_team_is_winning 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    California law (and other places)

    SB 145 would eliminate automatic sex offender registration for young adults who have anal or oral sex with a minor. Instead, a judge would make the decision, just as they do now in cases involving vaginal intercourse.

    This bill does not change the fact that it is illegal for an adult to have sex with a minor. SB 145 was meant to affect cases where the minor is a teenager between ages 14 to 17, and the offender, an adult, within a 10-year age range.

    Within a 10 year age range! So 24 and 14 ??

    Our favorite asshole legislator:

    The bill's author, State Senator Scott Wiener, said the controversy over SB 145 was based on people's misunderstanding of the changes and some lies about it.

    Then he had the nerve to claim it was to protect gay people. Totally doesn't make it sound like men 24 are having sex with boys 14, does it?

    https://www.abc10.com/article/news/politics/newsom-controversial-sb-145-new-law/103-238a7155-93a3-4f30-9daf-5d277d7ac91e

    [–]our_team_is_winning 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    attempting to penetrate a prepubertal girl is akin to torture

    Men don't seem to grasp that at all. I think of all the Muslim men with their child brides entering Europe. The PAIN.

    Glad you wrote all that. What good comes of children having sex, smoking, drinking alcohol, etc.? I knew tons of people who did, beginning ages 12-14 (in the early 80s). Nothing like comforting your 14 year old friend through her pregnancy scare :( That was pre-AIDS too. I thought that post-AIDS more education was encouraging people to hold off or at least use condoms. Guess not.