you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 27 insightful - 7 fun27 insightful - 6 fun28 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

it's same gender attraction.

Ah, yes-- a pink-wearing person's attraction to another pink-wearing person! The attraction of a person who likes monster trucks to another monster-truck-liker!

Hell, why do we even need PEOPLE involved, anyway? "The love that dares not speak its name" could now apparently be between two identical paint swatches!

Is anyone else beginning to suspect that this obsession with "gender" is at least sometimes a matter of... pathological prudishness? An attempt to, in effect, de-sexualize sexuality? Make it about disembodied shit like clothes and abstractions and fuckin' COLORS instead of, yanno, ew-y genitals? And the stuff you do with 'em? And the feelings associated with that? Which apparently these people are just too uncomfortable with?

The worst part, I think, is that they can't ADMIT their discomfort; they need to see themselves as proud sex-pozi sluts... and apparently redefining "sex" so that it's about the fake shit associated with sex (i.e., gender), rather than sex itself, is their way of doing this. So naturally biological sex has gotta go, too. Being inextricably linked with that gross FUCKING business and all.

[–]DimDroog 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

"The love that dares not speak its name" could now apparently be between two identical paint swatches!

HAHAHAAA!

Dear god, I'm dying.