What's interesting is in the comments they say the person is mentally unstable and probably lies about everything including "identity" but for some reason you can't question that identity even if you know that the person isn't serious and is actually a crazy person.

Their arguments aren't terrible in terms of the way people can't seem to understand having 2 ideas in their head at the same time... Just the way they deify self ID is so weird. People do need to agree that you can exist outside of sectarian narratives though. I do think that doing so would actually hurt their own TRA propaganda which might make sense as to why so many of them use the "no true Scotsman" fallacy when one of them does something wrong. They need the narrative to have TRAs be the eternal victim in all cases otherwise it isn't as easy to make ridiculous arguments that minor criticisms are "literal violence."