you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]our_team_is_winning 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Why did I click? Why? "Degrading holes" -- we shouldn't be sharing a planet, we really shouldn't.

[–]zerosis 33 insightful - 4 fun33 insightful - 3 fun34 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Notice the 'cis women only'

Trans exclusionary is perfectly okay if it's not a gay or lesbian sub

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 27 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

They're much less infuriated by straight men refusing to indulge them because as straight men they haven't been taught to believe that straight men are beneath them.

But when a homosexual or a woman disagrees with them, they see it as an insult to their nonexistent superiority.

[–]pacmanla 21 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

As a heterosexual male, this is an interesting theory to me, & an insight as to why there's no "smoke" or heavy intent, to come after heterosexual males as other groups. The thing with TRAs attacking biological females as they are, do they honestly believe that heterosexual males with significant others are going to sit back & let biological males "replace" females, lol. VAST MAJORITY of heterosexual males are not buying these males as women & a tipping point will be reach where you have delusional males attempting to "replace" females in part "replacing" these heterosexual men significant others, lol. Do they honestly believe a large group of men who don't buy them as women anyway, will sit back & let that happen? They will sooner or later HAVE to face straight men, there's no avoiding that.

[–]DollMeat-eating Vagitarian 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. Can't wait for this, because sorry to say, women are letting these people walk all over us.