you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 33 insightful - 1 fun33 insightful - 0 fun34 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"genital preference" or "sexual preference". There is no such thing as a "preference" in regards to people who are exclusively same-sex or exclusively opposite-sex attracted.

[–]mvmlego 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Unpopular opinion: I don't see what's wrong with the word "preference". It doesn't imply that the absolute or relative strengths of two desires can be changed, nor does it suggest that they should be changed.

[–]reluctant_commenter 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Here's the problem I see with it, and to be fair this may significantly depend on what part of the world you're in (I'm in the US)-- the word "preference" usually has the connotation of, both options are acceptable but I like one more. So for example, if one says, "I would prefer to drink some orange juice rather than a bottle of poison," the statement might seem silly, sarcastic, or ridiculous-- because who really is okay with drinking a bottle of poison? "Preference" is a misleading term-- really, no one would drink the poison. Likewise, if I say, "I would prefer to date women," the implication is that you would settle for dating men. In the context of sexual orientation, this only really makes sense for a bisexual to say, because they are attracted to both sexes by definition. (One could argue semantics and pick out edge cases, e.g. "I'm straight but I would date someone of my same sex if I never had to have sex with them, and they gave me a shitton of money!" or whatever, but that's the general idea.)

That's just my take on it. The context I see TRAs use it in, at least, is: "Oh, lesbians would be fine with dicks, they just prefer to not date someone with a dick," because TRAs believe sexual orientation is a moral choice that one makes. When actually, pretty much all lesbians would not be comfortable with that (or only in the context of a sexless relationship, or whatever)...

Again, I'm sure this may differ by region. But I know that's what TRAs typically mean.

[–]mvmlego 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

So for example, if one says, "I would prefer to drink some orange juice rather than a bottle of poison," the statement might seem silly, sarcastic, or ridiculous-- because who really is okay with drinking a bottle of poison?

I agree that this would be a silly and probably sarcastic question, but that's not because of the word "prefer"; it's because the answer is so obvious that the question doesn't need to be asked. Consider a scenario where there is no obvious answer:

Alice: I've got Dirty Dancing, Friday the 13th, and The Shining. Which do you prefer?

Bob: Dirty Dancing, I guess. I hate horror movies.

To me (also an American), this seems to be a completely normal use of the word. I see "preference" merely as a simple matter of ranking.

[–]reluctant_commenter 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To me (also an American), this seems to be a completely normal use of the word

Interesting. Because this is very much a different connotation from how I have heard it-- and it's exactly why, for example, people got so mad at Amy Conen Barett or whatever about her phrasing, not just TRAs.

I see "preference" merely as a simple matter of ranking.

Unfortunately, most trans rights activists do not.

I get why you would not see this usage of the word as a concern, though, since you have a different connotation of it.