Thank you. Here is my rebuttal and sources:

Fossil fuels: During the extraction phase of fossil fuel exploitation, there are two main impacts on biodiversity: directly through conversion, degradation, pollution, or disturbance of habitats at extraction sites (Beckmann, Murray, Seidler, & Berger, 2012; Camilli et al., 2010; O'Rourke & Connolly, 2003), and indirectly by increasing access for loggers, farmers, hunters, and settlements (Laurance, Goosem, & Laurance, 2009). After extraction, the distribution, refinement, and use of fossil fuels again impacts biodiversity directly through habitat destruction associated with infrastructure development and pollution (Parish et al., 2013). From this evidence, we can conclude that the use of fossil fuels is harmful to humans, animals, and their habitats. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12448#conl12448-bib-0006

Atmospheric carbon is the highest it's been in 800,000 years, based on direct measurements as well as atmospheric samples contained in ice cores. Shown in this graph: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ As of November 2020, total atmospheric carbon has increased to 415 parts per million, as opposed to 280 ppm in 1850, and as further opposed to the 185 ppm of carbon during the Last Glacial Maximum (which occurred between 26,500 years ago and 20,000 years ago).

The following is a list of over 200 scientific organizations across the globe that maintain the position that climate change is caused by humans: http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html