you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Why is the Kinsey scale legitimate? Why wouldn't a more legitimate spectrum be asexual - monosexual - bisexual? That makes more logical sense.

[–]MyLongestJourney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It is a scale of sexual attraction.So why count asexuals in?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's a spectrum of sexuality, not a scale (how's that different - because the kinsey scale is specifically a spectrum with varying amounts of gayness and biness and straightness?). This thread is specifically about the spectrum being ridiculous. It's 100% gay, everything else bi, 100% straight. That is ridiculous. 0-1-2 makes more sense than 1-2-(a different)1 as a spectrum.

[–]MyLongestJourney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You know what ? I am tired of arguing semantics. Have a nice day.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I asked a question. You answered. I asked another question. Not sure how we're arguing semantics, but you have a good one, too.

[–]MyLongestJourney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whatever dude.