you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

When they say "could not be sequenced" does that mean they didn't have the tools to identify the specimens or that the specimens have not been seen before, ie they are totally new kinds of fungi in the neovagina?

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Some very light Googling suggests that this just means the process of sequencing could not be completed because of some sort of issue with the sample. Someone else can elaborate on this if they have time to find a good source.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks!

[–]kwallio 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Usually that means they didn't get enough amplicon to sequence. Could be problems with the pcr reaction or something else, doesn't say anything about the source except that something in the sampling and analysis went wrong.

[–]Rosefield 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Fungi from yuggoth