This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 32 insightful - 2 fun32 insightful - 1 fun33 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Because the agenda pushers have been trying to manipulate us into forgetting biological sex. In the beginning, things were simple and everyone agreed with your statement on the matter. Then everything changed when the nonbinary nation attacked.

First, they wanted to create a distinction between sex and gender. They claimed to acknowledge biological sex and its unchanging nature while merely expanding gender to mean a different thing that could have more meanings and categories.

Now, however, that they have gotten enough supporters of the several gender nonsense, they are backpedalling and trying to merge sex and gender back into one thing. This would mean that sex would take on the new definition assigned to gender and true biological sex would be erased from public memory.

Their goal is to eliminate fact, so first they prepared their fantasy in front of us and are now showing signs of forcing it on us and applying it outside the bounds they said they would follow. This happens quite a bit in politics and was a strategy used by Adolf Hitler. He would say that he only wanted to take over a small area, and the Allies would let him. Several small areas later, Germany had amassed a large area and was now a force that would not be easily toppled. This is what the TQIA++ has been doing, slowly moving the goalpost forward until now they are deep within our territory, and now will not as easily be defeated as if the gay and lesbian community had simply exiled them in the first place

[–]BiHorror 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

First, they wanted to create a distinction between sex and gender

I don't like NB, but they weren't the ones who coined that... It was John Money who did that. Which then it was accepted by feminists and later queer/"gender" theorists (TRAs). Which then coined stuff like GNC which is then where NBs started popping up.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But even being GNC and not letting your gender be a determining factor in your life doesn't magically make everyone have their own gender. What they're doing is taking reasonable things, such as everyone expressing their gender and sexuality in a unique way, and taking it to the literal extreme and saying that everyone has a unique gender and sexuality. Two chocolate cakes can taste different, but they're still both chocolate and there's no need to treat them as entirely different flavors. It may be useful to make distinctions within chocolate, such as german chocolate cake, but that is no less a chocolate cake than any other.

They apply reasonable statements to things that they don't apply to, which makes it difficult to call them out because the statements aren't too far from the truth, it's just being used incorrectly.

[–]BiHorror 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, considering the topic of this overall post, this goes both ways. NBs shouldn't exist, neither should "GNC" shit. I'm not "GNC," I'm just a normal person who doesn't conform to sex stereotypes. I don't need a special label for that, especially one that bastardized the English language as much as TRAs did. Both of these terms removed the original definition of gender and come from queer theory. Shit, even if gender wasn't used for sex, it still was bastardized for some "muh feelings" or "muh rebellion to societial expectations."