you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]oofreesouloo⚡super lesbian⚡ 37 insightful - 1 fun37 insightful - 0 fun38 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, asexual and aromantic should not belong. For me, it only makes sense a LGB community, because it's dedicated to SAME SEX attraction. Asexualitiy is lack of sexual attraction. Besides, what rights do asexuals want? What discrimination have they faced or do they face? None. The only exception for me would be homoromantic asexuals because those asexuals actual do suffer discrimination because they're can engage in homosexual relationships. Aromantic people? Apart from aromantic ASEXUALS (so asexuals who prefer to be single), I don't think those people exist. I think people who don't lack sexual attraction and identify as aromantic have mental issues/commitment issues/attachment style issues/trauma/etc etc etc to address. For me, it's not normal that a person isn't able to develop an emotional connection with anyone. Only LGB.

[–]insta 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Aromantic people? ... I don't think those people exist. I think people who don't lack sexual attraction and identify as aromantic have mental issues/commitment issues/attachment style issues/trauma/etc etc etc to address.

https://i.imgur.com/W9kjIG7_d.webp?maxwidth=728&fidelity=grand

I honestly think it's just a coping mechanism for people who are resided lonely people. That's fine, I don't care if anyone wants to be alone. No sweat off my back, but don't expect me to go along with your "aromantic" delusions.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Same. It’s okay if someone wants to be single for life, but they don’t need a new label for this.