As creepy as that is (porn = women in their natural state), looks to me like just the tip of the iceberg. And the rest makes it even worse.

The beneath-the-surface part isn't that they think women are hairless, exactly. It's that what women actually are... doesn't matter. Because the only REAL women are the ones in these men's heads. Unless you match their IDEA of "woman"... you don't count. Don't even truly exist. You're only a poor approximation of reality: the idea. The naturally-hairless adult woman. Who is also indelibly-pretty, endlessly sexually-accommodating, and forever young (among other things).

Reality-- ACTUAL reality, meaning flesh-and-blood women-- inevitably gets in the way of the Idea. Compromises it. With the concrete facts of our bodies, personalities, aging. We're always doomed to fall short.

That's what's behind the eclipse of women by "transwomen", I think. Because what are they, when you get right down to it, other than an idea... in a man's head? Unconstrained by all that pesky actually-existing nonsense. And, therefore, the realest women who ever realed!

Which is to say: purely a male fantasy, from beginning to end.