Does anyone think Kamala Harris (she/her) is really a TRA, or is she just LARPing as one in order to win?

submitted by BEB from (self.LGBDropTheT)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BEB[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Utopians? Meet the Democrats in the California state legislature.

On the transgender demands issue, the Democrats in the California state legislator are also really fucking dumb - they're about to pass a bill that would allow men to self-identify as women and be housed in women's jails - and/or corrupt as fuck. Men's fee-fees over women's safety.

For instance, Scott Wiener, the Democratic California state senator who pushes all the Transgender Lobby bills receives money from a company, Gilead Sciences, that makes Truvada and sponsors the transgender march on Washington DC. Trans have a much higher rate of HIV, but I think there's something more with Gilead pushing the TRA agenda.

So, I'm with you to some extent. Utopians, especially when they're not really Utopians, like many Democrats in the California state legislature, they're just pushing "inclusion" because they're being paid to do so, can be really dangerous.

[–]insta 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Utopians? Meet the Democrats in the California state legislature.

Yes. There is a huge problem with idiotic utopians in our society right now. I dunno if you noticed but every second person thinks we're just like one policy implementation away from the promised land. We only need to socially engineer a little more and then we'll have the new Soviet Man.

receives money from a company, Gilead Sciences, that makes Truvada and sponsors the transgender march on Washington DC.

This kind of stuff is what I throw in the face of everyone who thinks we can simply "Get money out of politics". Everyone thinks "money in politics" are just oil companies buying off congress or something but they never view their preferred social activist groups as "money in politics". This is a tangent but just something that bothers me about people who don't actually think through their own ideas. LGBT groups lobbying congress is still "money in politics" equal to some big pharma company lobbying for something else. The only difference is some view "money in politics" as good and others as bad. There's no consistency.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Your submission has been removed due to:

    Rule 4. Disallowed Language

    Our sub seeks to champion LGB people of a variety of backgrounds, and want all of our LGB users to feel welcome. We do not allow specific ideological slang/terms to be used which may be used in a negative or divisive context. These include, but are not limited to: TIM/TIF, Timmy/Tiffany, MTT/FTT, etc

    We suggest using the following terminology instead: trans-identified (fe)male, trans (wo)man, trans natal (fe)male, trans people, FTM / MTF

    If you edit your submission to remove the phrase, or you feel this removal was performed in-error, please let the subreddit Moderators know by sending ModMail so your submission may be re-approved.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.