use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
[sidebar coming soon]
GoogleJames Damore's diversity lawsuit against Google comes to a quiet end
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from cnet.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]the_nybbler 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
What it amounts to is there are endless procedural/technical barriers to getting something through the courts, and endless ways around them if the courts are sympathetic to the claim. Courts will accept discrimination claims from some people (women and minorities) but not others. If you look at any given case in isolation and are completely disingenous, you can find a "neutral" reason why it was decided the way it was or why it didn't go forward.
But the pattern is so clear that everyone knows you can get away with blatant discrimination against whites, Asians, and/or males, including openly having job openings they are not eligible for, or entire publicly funded schools which exclude them. And conversely, that even the mildest hint of anything negative towards a favored group is enough for a lawsuit. The neutrality of the statute simply doesn't matter given the mendaciousness of the judges.
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Wisdom! Saved.
[–]whistlepig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
You make some good points... however the article said there is no response from Damore. Doesn't that imply there was a financial agreement to motivate him to move on?
If he was just blown off by the court... I'd assume he'd say something about it.
[–]the_nybbler 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Doesn't that imply there was a financial agreement to motivate him to move on?
No, just the employment contract with Google which specifies arbitration, and then the arbiters imposing silence.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]the_nybbler 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]whistlepig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]the_nybbler 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)