you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BettysBitterButter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

proven to be particularly damaging to society in every case

So... no eugenics for any diseases, then, I guess. WTH is "particularly damaging to society in every case"? Even something like CF would not fairly meet that criteria. Sickle cell wouldn't meet it. Even schizophrenia wouldn't meet it.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Schizophrenia and other genetic diseases are always damaging.

Edit: Schizophrenia isn't genetic, but BettysBitterButter claimed it was so I included it in my argument.

[–]Realwoman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Schizophrenia isn't genetic. It has a genetic component but even though most schizophrenics don't have children, the percentage in the population stays stable. It can also be controlled with medication.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The person I was responding too said it was, so I just included it in my argument. I'll edit in a disclaimer though.