I just lost a long comment because I misclicked. I'll dump a few sources here for people to know where to go down the rabbit hole from:

Satoshi Kanazawa, Gad Saad, E. B. Bax, Camille Paglia, Janice Fiamengo, Lawrence Kohlberg's moral stages, Sonja Starr's research on sentencing disparity, evolutionary psychology, Selective Service Act, Women are Wonderful effect, automatic in-group preference among women, simping behavior, etc.

https://archive.org/details/fraudoffeminism00baxerich

Hugenberg, Kurt, and Sabine Sczesny. “On Wonderful Women and Seeing Smiles: Social Categorization Moderates the Happy Face Response Latency Advantage.” Social Cognition 24, no. 5 (2006): 516–539. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kurt_Hugenberg/publication/247838456_On_Wonderful_Women_and_Seeing_Smiles_Social_Categorization_Moderates_the_Happy_Face_Response_Latency_Advantage/links/0046352af27bc710f1000000.pdf

Rudman, Laurie A., and Stephanie A. Goodwin. “Gender Differences in Automatic In-Group Bias: Why Do Women like Women More than Men like Men?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87, no. 4 (2004): 494.

Starr, Sonja B. “Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases.” American Law and Economics Review 17, no. 1 (2014): 127–159.

I do not know if this contradicts who I am replying to. Whatever is consistent with truth and reality I support. This comment is not meant as disagreement. If we have taken any positions in the past that were nonsense, just because it seemed to strengthen our group, those should be abandoned, of course. Let science speak for itself, but I also would not rely on professionals too much, many of which have been rather spineless, as it's their job at risk, not ours. Whatever literature there is to bring more truth to the world, spread it and share it. I would be afraid to sit back, relax and assume that the establishment is going to sort itself out. The Internet has been a great tool at pushing back against mainstream narratives.

Your affectionate uncle,

Screwtape