you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ghostraider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Intersex conditions do not play a role when defining sex, that's why in your link in the first sentences it says that the condition affects males. Also I didn't define sex, I just said that intersex conditions need the framework (which I can't call binary because it is not the exact definition and will prompt you to go again "binary is not that" even though you would get what I mean) male/female to exist. You just went on being super picky with my post with something that actually supports what I said. It doesn't make me mad, I actually find amusing the need to do that.

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why u mad, though?

[–]ghostraider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It doesn't make me mad, I actually find amusing the need to do that.

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That’s exactly what a mad person would say.

[–]ghostraider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That implication only goes in one direction, not the opposite :D