use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~7 users here now
Introduce yourself to the SaidIt community
I've created s/FuckTheAltRight!
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from self.Introductions
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (11 children)
"fuck __" is objectively a sentiment devoted to the bottom two levels of the pyramid.
I completely agree and just banned the sub.
[–]GreenCappy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (10 children)
What name do I have to give to a sub to be accepted then? Antifascism?
[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (9 children)
far right isnt alowed there
isn't this against the whole concept of how saidit is supposed to work?
[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (8 children)
See Rule 4b of moderation rules
[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (7 children)
it looks to me (and from what I know of saidit) that rule 4 is meant to prevent this kind of thing exactly. that you can't just exclude people on saidit because you don't like their viewpoint, as was common on reddit and voat.
how do you think "on-topic" applies here?
[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (6 children)
Rule 4B
[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (5 children)
?
this is mod rule #4 that I see: "Mods must not remove nor censor good-faith AND on-topic posts or comments." I assumed by "b" you meant "a" is "good faith" and "b" is "on-topic"? are we not looking at the same set of rules?
[–]GreenCappy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)
4b) Mods CAN remove opposing opinions that are high on the pyramid of debate, and ban those users on that sub, if and only if the 2 following conditions are met: 1: The fact the sub removes opposing opinions is announced in the sub's sidebar. 2: The mods uncheck the sub setting "allow this sub to appear on /all"
That's what I did
[–]comments 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
Oh I see. I didn't see that rule on the FAQ page, I guess there's someplace else mod rules are written?
[–]GreenCappy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
https://www.saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/w6s/saidit_rules_for_moderators/
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - (11 children)
[–]GreenCappy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (10 children)
[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (9 children)
[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (7 children)
[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–]GreenCappy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]comments 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]GreenCappy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)