I disagree with most of what you're saying.

However, I'll respond to your claim based on your position.

For the sake of the argument let's assume the political narrative is factual.

After what they did to the Jews and to homosexuals...

I'm assuming you are referring to what you would describe as the holocaust in this statement.

Do you believe it is a moral and ethical position to "blame the sons, for the sins of their fathers"?

Either way, I'm sure you are aware of the tens of billions of dollars that the German people have paid to Swiss banks in "reparations".
So, there's no ongoing debate about a lack of material compensation, etc.

The German sons paid for the alleged sins in the literal sense.

The Palestinian population living in what is known today as Israel had nothing to do with any holocaust.

They were not involved in WW2 violence in any significant aspect.

The modern state of Israel was created in a region, which had been continuously populated for thousands of years.

Hundreds of thousands of people who were living there were murdered and driven from their lands.

Concerning the murdered and exiled Palestinian natives: Do you believe it is a moral and ethical position to "blame the sons, for the sins of their fathers"?

Should the current residents of Israel be forced to return the stolen land, and pay reparations?

AKA Christian and Muslim interlopers trying to drag Jews down to their level. They are violating God's first two Commandments by not being Jewish.

A link in one of your previous comments indicates that some Jews believe that they are person's of color, based upon genetically inherited traits except;

intense bright lights will make people's faces look pale and washed out.

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/yes-ashkenazi-jews-including-gal-gadot-are-people-of-color/

If being jewish is based on ethnicity, then it is impossible for other ethnicities to be "jewish".

Additionally, the teachings of Christ and the apostles are predicated upon a philosophy of nonviolence and radical passivism.

"Turn the other cheek", etc.

The philosophy of nonviolence is rarely applied by those in power; regardless of the religion.

Regardless, nonviolence is universally recognized as a morally virtuous position among all religions, and should be promoted as an ideal to strive for.

I'm sure you would agree...