Chance of surviving COVID-19 by age and sex

submitted by magnora7 from zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Why are we shutting down the economy again?

I think caution is good. But it's become clear this is literally a bad flu season in terms of the numbers... so the ridiculous over-reactions are no longer necessary. It's not the black death like people thought back in March.

So now that the stats are in, and we know it's not much more dangerous than the flu, why is no one de-escalating the situation? Why is no one calming and informing the public, but instead making them more angry and divided over outdated emotions based on bad numbers and malfunctioning testing methods, when it is known both the PCR test and antibody test frequently give false positives.

Plus I have a theory a lot of people are working from home now, and they don't want that gravy train to end so they don't want the virus to be "over". So everyone is just riding that earlier fear from March, instead of actually paying attention to the science.

I, along with many others, find this very frustrating. Especially since the people who are "playing it safe" are the ones acting as if they're on the side of science. But really they're on the side of fear.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

why is no one de-escalating the situation? Why is no one calming and informing the public, but instead making them more angry and divided over outdated emotions based on bad numbers and malfunctioning test.

Because this is a gigantic psyop to help bring about the great reset / new world order. Schwab all but spelled it out for the masses but we live in idiocracy.

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

I keep hearing this "great reset" term but I think that itself is term to mess with people's heads. There is no great reset. What will change? Nothing. Just greedy people vying for power, same as ever.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What will change?

Well the economy for starters... It's changing as we speak.

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah, I mean welcome to every economic crisis we've had every 8 years for the last 150 years

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well I hope you're right because my tin foil radar is forecasting an absolute shitshow.

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh it will be a shitshow, and already has been. But was so was 2008, and 2001, and 1987. It goes on.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

True.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

4IR; the Great Reset. Read Corey Morningstar's work at thewrongkindofgreen.org or it might be wrongkindofgreen.org and http://www.theartofannihilation.com/

Or search the terms covid or great reset in searx or duckduckgo like "covid site:thewrongkindofgreen.org"

There are hundreds of articles on this reset and I don't think it is here yet. I think they plan the reset in 2021. 33 years from the 1988 econ mag saying to get ready for world currency in 2018, the banks did get ready.

IMF president Christine Lagarde talking about the law of 7 in boom and bust cycles and if we take this occult gobbledygook seriously, because they do, then 2021 is the year which something bad happens.

How do you think they can inteoduce the 4IR and a world currency backed by a gold SDR without a massive demonitization scheme and economic collapse?

[–]CompleteDoubterII 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think the people who argue for a lockdown say that the virus seriously harms those who survive, or something similar to that.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes but so does every other flu, and there's no proof the long-term damage is any more severe than any other flu or cold in history

[–]CompleteDoubterII 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The flu seriously harms those who survive? I don't know much biology, but that seems absurd (also I am confident the point of saying something is like the flu is to say it is mild, not serious). Regarding the long-term damage being the same as the flu, some would disagree (to be fair, Moon of Alabama has gone totally insane (see point number six). Even if there is no proof of long term side effects, if serious long term side effects are a reasonable possibility, then the issue becomes vastly more complicated. It would be problematic if a very non-lethal virus spreads to the vast majority of the population, only to give them serious heart damage or something of that sort; although lockdowns themselves are serious health issues. Not that I have looked into Covid-19 much.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Given that the flu vaccine causes a couple of deaths every million people and the risk of the new covid vaccine will be much higher than that then in the younger age groups it's quite clear the vaccine will cause more deaths than it prevents.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

6,000 probably have died to Covid, if that, wen we consider that PCR test cycle transitions are over 35%. Thus, 60,000 people are actually positive.