Ruqqus-cels could this be salvation?

submitted by takavoid513 from self.Incels

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

ya'll are welcome to be here if you can abide by the strict no advocating violence rule. it hasn't gone so well in the past.

[–]greybeard 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Can you give an example what is allowed and what isn't? How triggerhappy are the local admins (and you)?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

no glorifying mass murderers, etc. https://saidit.net/s/Incels/comments/1brg/changes_in_this_sub/

[–]greybeard 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

What about meme glorification? Like calling stuff Tedpilled, or advocating for marxist-rodgerism? Or a phrase I read elsewhere: "May Saint Rodger smite them with his BMW", so jokes in that veneer.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

nope, too edgy. this is not a free speech site.

[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Is this rule specific to /s/Incels and not applicable to other subs? For example, if I glorified Joshua from the Bible who was clearly a mass murderer in /s/Religion, would this be a violation? Actually what about glorifying God? God is a mass murderer, so would this be a violation?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

No glorifying murder, whether by God or anything else.

[–]Zvezda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why not by God?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because fuck Old Testament God

[–]takavoid513[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

It should not be the case. All our rules on ruqqus are the same to the ones on here. The only issue is if our memes are edgy enough to be considered advocation of violence, which was not really the case for our group the only issue was that the admins over there banned users any for of criticism of protected groups or memes that mention elliot or other ERs. That and ban evaders who kept spamming accounts. Edgy users typically got banned because our group was tame compared to others.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

memes that mention elliot or other ERs

Memeing about ERs is not going to fly. That's glorifying people known primarily for murder, the site owner has already said no. If someone wants to actively moderate and take this stuff down, that could work. https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

[–]takavoid513[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Understood. We mainly talked about personal issues and coping. We never really liked to talk nor talked about the nutcases. We just need a place to cope. This could minimally be an issue for news related topics that are posted and discussed, but most are on the realm on how it effects us incels in general.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

that sounds fine. as long as there's an attempt to generally avoid advocating violence/breaking the rules.