you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]censorshipment 2 insightful - 10 fun2 insightful - 9 fun3 insightful - 10 fun -  (1 child)

Eh, I'd say the focus on reproductive rights and abortions was the most detrimental. It's all I've really heard about since the 80s (I was born in '83). Feminists should've been fighting to separate themselves from men in general. Husbands wouldn't have been wearing their wives' lingerie if women weren't marrying men in the first place. Why weren't most feminists also separatists? What was their problem with living among women only and building communities without men? Or simply being a lone wolf fighting to liberate women from all forms of relationships with men?

Why isn't this sub much bigger than it is? - https://www.reddit.com/r/wgtow/comments/mgln8d/why_isnt_this_sub_much_bigger_than_it_is/

Women aren’t stupid or being held back by some imaginary hand. They like being with men and would rather be with them than by themselves, despite the evidence that men are a waste of time and a bad investment. Women want to be housewives and serve men, that’s why most reject wgtow ideas. They don’t feel they have any value as a person without a husband. Doesn’t matter how miserable they are deep down, they need to show the world they can get a husband for validation. We need to be honest about women too.

[–]Archie 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lack of access to abortion is a direct cause of death and/or suffering for women and hard a direct cause of women being forced to stop studying/stop their career and being forced to end up at home, dependant on a man to even survive.

It has to be a feminist cause. It is indeed one of the most important ones still, because it isn't solved at all in the US, unlike other feminist issues.