Self-described affluent men's lifestyle site tries to gaslight basic human sexuality: "The Problem With Identifying as 'Super Straight'- A 'sexuality' based entirely on trans exclusion isn't a preference; it's prejudice"

sneeuweekhoorn · 2021-04-05T23:52:10+00:00

Welcome to the real world where people's sexualities are exclusive and normal people just learn to get the fuck over it.

Femaleisnthateful · 2021-04-05T23:41:25+00:00

And it's OK to have prejudices about who you do and don't have sex with.

Besides, 'Super' sexuality as I understand it, wasn't based on 'trans-exclusion' but rather sex. This is the same fallacy they invoke about 'TERFs', and women's rape crisis shelters.

JasonNecks · 2021-04-06T04:07:18+00:00

From the article:

“If you’re genuinely not interested in a certain set of binary genitalia, that’s okay; you shouldn’t have sex with someone that you don’t want to,”

This is the same as saying that it is okay to be super straight.

TheOnyxGoddess · 2021-04-06T06:05:58+00:00

Why are you targetting "Super Straight"? While you're at it, target homosexuality and bisexuality. /s

They must want more people to play with bleeding wounds and flaccid dicks.

FlippyKing · 2021-04-06T17:31:58+00:00

They've all repeated the lie so many times and they still know it's a lie, so any thing that reminds them that "TWAW" is a lie they have to jump all over. It's a shame that misogyny is such a big part of their acceptance of the lie though, and I say that because the take pot-shots at the Vancouver rape shelter that serves only actual women. That to me is the worst part of it.

But, bottom line is only the most mentally ill or people who meet the legal definition of imbecile believe the lie that TWAW. It's even in the way the confront GC people, "don't you believe TWAW?" or "It sounds like you do not believe TWAW", where the only response is "neither do you, you just pretend to think it."

GenderCritical

MODERATORS