And yet I wonder how far the people who parrot this phrase (TWAW) with such conviction are prepared to accept the consequences. One easy way to assess this is to pose the question devised by Helen Staniland: “Do you believe that male-sexed people should have the right to undress and shower in a communal changing room with teenage girls?”

Curiously, people who become very energised about the right of male-sexed people to use female toilets don’t like this question very much and try to avoid answering it. But it gets to the heart of the issue about single-sex spaces: do we believe a man is a woman because he says he is? Or is there something more fundamental about what makes a woman a woman?

Touché Quick tool for the arsenal. (additional formatting my own)

Or, as MarkTwainiac has so rightfully pointed out, disabled, elderly, or coma/unconscious state-women: Women or their Families who specify "female only attendants" are being overruled by this bullocks. (It isn't just about Buffy the teenager!)