you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WildApples 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It must be noted that the narrator's observation was imperfect. He suspected his eventual love interest of being loyal to the party because she appeared as a "bigoted adherent" when in reality that was a cover for her secret rebellion. So the line quoted was disproven by the remainder of the book. I see it as an acknowledgement that women have historically had so little power that they had to play along with those in power to survive. Women, already accustomed to lay with the same enemy they were fighting against (i.e. men), adapted that duality in response to the political climate. They were adept at feigning solidarity to survive.

I also view it as a recognition that women often have higher levels of religiosity and have historically been the enforcers of morality. Enforcing the social codes has been a way women could influence men when they had little political or legal power. I read it as Orwell saying that the political regime was able to co-opt women's tendency to uphold the social order and use it to further perpetuate their own cause.

[–]Rationalmind[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Orwell saying that the political regime was able to co-opt women's tendency to uphold the social order and use it to further perpetuate their own cause.

Agreed, I read it the same way. It’s also why I want to understand this because I want to protect women and girls from getting manipulated by actors like the TRAs.