you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]comradeconradical 26 insightful - 2 fun26 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

This sets an amazing precedent.

Strange how PinkNews is reporting that puberty blockers are OK for under 16 years old. The decision pretty clearly states that under 13 cannot consent, that 14-15 most likely cannot consent, and that 16-18 would need court approval for this experimental and largely undocumented medical treatment.

[–]Daraincork 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yes...extraordinary headline in Pink News. Clutching at straws a bit I think. Has leave to appeal been denied?

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think they are just too thick to understand the judgement.

Someone pointed out that all the TRAs (even Big Steph the trans-lawyer) were celebrating victory because they simply didn't understand except Jolyon Maugham who understood it all straight away and had a twitter meltdown.