I agree with this comment:

In almost every instance, I’d agree that in order to have a valid opinion, you have to at least watch the thing you’re criticizing, but for something that is potentially pedophilic, I’m all for prejudiced critiques without having viewed the content, simply because the act of viewing the content gives the manufacturers of said content a “win” anyways. And in a world that values quantity of quality (i.e. the story will just read “this is what is trending on Netflix”, without contextualizing that many of the ppl who have caused it to trend were overwhelmingly mortified and have since cancelled their Netflix accounts) it encourages others to make similar content, thus contributing to the increase in more potentially pedophilic content.

It would be like me purchasing an offensive album, so that I can burn it as a demonstration against said offensive album. It still counts as another unit sold at the record company. Purchasing it is counterproductive to my cause, and by doing so, I become part of the problem and not the solution.