Brief recap. Hate speech used to be: Wishing violence or suffering on other people, especially without reason

A few decades ago, the following was considered unacceptable: Using guilt, shame, or threats(removing jobs etc.) to silence a group of people.

But now, in 2020, hate speech means:

• Certain Worldviews(or thoughts) will be banned if it offends specific people.
• Offensive worldviews are called hate speech.
• It is offensive to define certain worldviews as "the truth"

Examples of Hate speech in 2020:

• "Woman(or girl) is a birth-right exclusive description of a human with female anatomy."
• "Woman is not a behavioral stereotype; dress, makeup, nail polish are not Womanhood"

• "Man or Woman = Born beautifully & unchangeably different, both equally human."

• "If you are born a woman, you are valuable and your womanhood is worth keeping."

• "If you are born a man, you are valuable and your manhood is worth keeping."

^ This gets flagged as hate speech in 2020, it is silenced.

---

I discovered 2020 hate speech detection has a loop hole to exit it.

The exit point is called: absolute truth.

For example:

"An apple is a real fruit"

So, Here is our exit point:

"J.K. Rowling is a real woman."

This is truth, BUT it borders on hatespeech, it could be considered exclusionary hate speech. When authorities try to silence you, make sure you record your experience,

let it be officially known that you got in trouble because you said:

"J.K. Rowling is a REAL woman."

Vile offensive, discriminatory hate speech, the capitalization is offensive.

Alert the authorities, proclaim it on the rooftops!

If anyone asks you, tell them:

People are being arrested for telling the truth

Let the general population be awakened to the vile hate speech of 2020:

"J.K. Rowling is a real woman."

---

Going further:

When someone says:

"Transwomen are REAL women"

If you fire back with:

"J.K. Rowling is a REAL woman"

Such violence could be considered hate speech that must be filtered as spam.

The spam filter relies on keywords.

Watch out if you use facts to write about J.K. Rowling without even mentioning her name.

Facts let you pinpoint exactly one person, without having to use keywords. The truth literally has no filter.

So if they ban the phrase: "J.K. Rowling is a woman."

Then you say: "The author of Harry Potter, is a woman."

Well golly gee, that's like, hate speech filter evasion.

---

What if you kept using facts?

What if you were creative about it?

What if you danced with the truth?

What if you said so many facts and avoided keywords so they can't filter it?

What if you looked up facts on J.K. Rowling and referred to her by using absolute truth?

There's a woman born in 1965, she wrote this book, the book sold more than 500 million copies.

She's a real woman.

Well, gosh. You could get real creative with this.

You could make bold yet thought-ambigous statements statements of pure imagination that cannot be detected as hate speech.

It's as if most of the world's authority has gone Syltherin.

Here's another example:

Let's go Gryffindor.