the-ham-bummer comments on GC: What are the issues with defining sex as both primary and secondary sex characteristics, rather than only primary sex characteristics?

GC: What are the issues with defining sex as both primary and secondary sex characteristics, rather than only primary sex characteristics?

submitted 3 years ago * by [deleted] from self.GCdebatesQT

22 comments

new insightful fun

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]the-ham-bummer 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)

There is only one characteristic. X vs. Y.

Sex is a specialization facilitating mating, survival and transmission of genetic material. The end.

Sex discussed in the context of pleasure and social life is a degeneration (said without negative connotation, like a cheerleader show is a degeneration of a sports match even if it looks good - more or less. In fact by being childless I belong to the degenerate ones, and I am not sorry nor offended by it).

Sex discussed in the context of LGBT is a weaponization of such degeneration to provide both psychological control of the masses and the removal of control over offspring (the objective is to make artificial sexual reproduction the norm, as natural one does not generate profit and is outside the control of the system).

So I urge people to realize what game they are into.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago* (3 children)

[deleted]

[–]the-ham-bummer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)

You have read too quickly because your reconstruction cannot semantically hold, from the moment i refer to the sex act as "mating".

Control over offspring derives from responsibility over offspring, and it's you who should ask therapists whether it's a good idea to impose some control or not. You might be surprised.

Degenerate, online dictionary: 1. Having declined, as in function or nature, from a former or original state: a degenerate form of an ancient folk art. 2. Morally corrupt or given to vice. ...

and I can assure you the etymology is about meaning #1. If I sound homophobic to you, that's your prob.

"conspiracy theorist" You decry my use of "system" while calling me "A", singular. What am I? a literal colony of cells. You, same, or maybe an NPC AI. So, we both are systems. Evil people make systems too. It's not a theory, pick up any history book.

"break free from you" LOL I wish I had that power.

[+][deleted] 3 years ago* (1 child)

[deleted]

[–]the-ham-bummer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)

You literally comment in conspiracy subs, so you are a conspiracy theorist.

Except when the conspiracy turns out to be there, which makes you a reality denier. BTW I also comment in car subs, which makes me a car. Interesting theorem.

sound like

Hey how about the content? Because you probably didn't get it, if you concentrate on the style.

control

sterile no true scotsman. You imply there is only one degree of control, false, that it's the nazi style one, false, and that I implied that, false. Nice triplet, mate. The responsibility over a partner in a relationship is a broad theme and yes, it implies correspondent control, but I won't discuss with you the reasons why if Job by A finances the relationship with B, A has the last word about relocating because he must either find another job or ask for a transfer.

can only mean "mating" (or biological sex).

No, it means what I said it meant, a differentiation. Which in the context of pleasure and social life describes all the ways different people interact to get pleasure or to form social bonds. Which is anatomy or sociology, not demography, in a nutshell, degeneration.

Please stay on topic

said as the poster of a screenshot of a different thread

"degenerate" religious beliefs

ah so that was what's triggering you? religion and darwin have nothing to do with sex. Darwin has something to do with the origins of sex, but what I said was not about the origin but the result.

The trouble with our discussion IMHO is that you feel judged, and react. Since I haven't been judging you, the only one remaining is yourself. So either there is no judgement at all or you are projecting. In the latter case, I suggest to sidestep the sexual identity and behavior. Because it is a matter of conscience. Listen to your conscience, then mediate with your intellect. All the rest comes later, even religion. Act according to what you (your conscience, not your education) think is right for the system called life, because that's where you come from, instead of reacting. Good luck.

GCdebatesQT

MODERATORS