I didn't say that, you did.

You're saying "All language and dialect has a knock on effect on all other statements."

Scouse is a dialect. So your'e saying it has a knock on effect of all other statements.

That doesn't sound right.

If you understand the purpose of abstraction layers in programing, then you can understand the use of abstraction layers in social constructs, and human language.

What do you think "abstraction layer" means in social constructs?

I can't think of anything in language that is analogous to abstraction layers in programming. The purpose of which is to facilitate refactoring.

Language and skewed logic can be used as tools.

Can they? Can you elaborate on that, perhaps with some concrete examples, so I can understand what you mean by "tool" and "skewed logic" here?

How are you not understanding the sentence as written?

Well, I suspect that its because you're on drugs, and just talking absolute bollocks, without any reality to the meaning. But I'm trying to find some sense in it.

Your beliefs, and understanding of how beliefs 'work' are not a prerequisite for objective reality, or how anything around you works.

Continually changing the subject like this makes the conversation really fragmented and difficult to follow. You weren't talking about objective reality. You're talking about using language somehow to manufacture consent without objective reality coming into it.