The narrative changes literally overnight

submitted by Chipit from files.catbox.moe

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

And people are supposed to trust the media. 🤡

[–]sandmax 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

The entire problem with the media has been these fagtards that have been pushing false agendas and hating on Trump and pushing the transgender agenda like MSNBC and CNN and New York Times etc etc yeah I understand that media always has its own little twist on things but those mainstream media f******** have really been things out of shape too much I hope somebody changes it

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Change happens when people vote with their wallet. When they don't sell the paper and the channel has no viewers, they quietly disappear.

[–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Change happens when people vote with their wallet

Sorry but that’s a bit naive. Change happens when rich financiers manipulate events to their advantage.

The only recourse the people have ever had is to band together & beat the financiers to death.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

It isn't naive, it is a simple fact. I didn't say it was the only method of instigating change, but it's an effective one which everyone is able to contribute to. It holds more power than petty protesting. Banding together does fuck all if it has no leverage.

[–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

The leverage is violence.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Violence undermines credibility and loses respect. Look at Antifa scum. Violence achieves little of worth without consequence.

[–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

When anti-fa scum attack us in the streets & burn our cities is it bad for the people to fight back?

Violence or the threat of violence is literally what all politics come down to. States literally operate on having a monopoly on force.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Maybe in lib-shit cities. Violence achieves a little in the short term and absolutely fuck all in the long term. Makes people no better than the Antifa scum. So no, it isn't the answer, it's only a defence if required.

[–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Lol, this is why so called conservatives always lose. You are never willing to take action

“Let’s all just vote with our wallets” good luck with that when companies spend billions on advertising that is literally designed to brainwash you into buying their shit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Rich financiers don't have that much control. The truth is nobody is in charge, and nobody knows what's going on. It's chaos all the way down.

[–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Partly, but the 0.1% clearly have a massive negative impact on society.