use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
A sub dedicated to the preservation of valuable information. Post your latest finds, tips, tricks, and favorite archives.
Sub endorsed archives:
How to:
See also:
The narrative changes literally overnight
submitted 11 months ago by Chipit from files.catbox.moe
view the rest of the comments →
[–]twolanterns 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 11 months ago* (4 children)
I see them as worthy of going to the chaingangs as much as the politician for being responsible for so much
the press/journalism is supposed to have special protection under the Constitution, but it can be easily argued that they largely have become propagandists rather than journalists
at minimum they should be 'Trust Busted' and broken up to destroy their monopoly status and undue influence (old days there were hundreds of newspapers in large cities with a broad spectrum of interests, but today it is just a few narrowly controlled voices nationally being heard thru a more invasive megaphone.)
[–]sandmax 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 11 months ago (1 child)
The mainstream media such as CNN and MSNBC and who are the others New York Times etc etc.. could be eliminated in a 24-hour period. The only people that would complain about it would be a small handful of trannies
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (0 children)
Irrelevant. If anyone had enough power to actually destroy the American media the American media would suck their dick. The only reason the New York Times isn't 1488 is that Hitler lost.
[–]VraiBleu 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (0 children)
Prison is too good for these traitors.
[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (0 children)
Easier solution. There are two types of news currently. Journalism, and Opinion Journalism. Currently the BULK of the news channels are Opinion Journalism, giving highly skewed "news" reports while being able to put any non-objective spin on it.
What they need to do is two fold.
This would solve probably 75% of the issues with fake news and skewed news, and anyone that wishes to hear some fake blowhard moron read an agenda is welcome to it on their own channel where they are not allowed to read "news" at all, just comment on it with their BS that is protected by the 1st amendment.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]twolanterns 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)
[–]sandmax 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]VraiBleu 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)