First of all the weapon in question is more powerful and focused than the frequencies used in the 5G network with 95GHz at what appears to be a single target. The 5G network has a range of 6GHz - 86GHz, which is a noticeable 9GHz less than the military grade weapon.

So we're talking about a stronger, focused beam being directly targeted at an individual versus a weaker, spread out beam. They also note that the beam makes you "Feel as if your whole body is on fire." While adding that it is not lethal, but very unpleasant. You think they would really roll something like this out if it caused you to feel immense discomfort? To hundreds of millions of people?

So I really think we're jumping the gun here in terms of how lethal it is. It's like saying that the rain is dangerous because there's high powered hoses out there that can slice right through you with the same amount of water. One is completely safe (minus the whole flooding thing lol) and the other is used to cut steel, yet both use the same amount of water.

Once further evidence shows that 5G when used as a cellphone service is harmful then I'll bend, but again all there is on the matter is pure speculation. I don't buy into speculation and I'm not even arguing it's safe. I'm saying we don't know.

Call for further tests, that's completely reasonable. Calling it genocide and saying the government is weaponizing it and they're testing it out in lamp posts in england is going completely off the deep end IMO. Making comparisons between two completely different applications of the same thing is NOT evidence, it's pure speculation. I'm all for new technology being tested for safety, I'm not for fear mongering and paranoia.

Sources below:

https://healthfreedomidaho.org/5g-military-weapon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G#Standards