you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]infocom6502 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks Raven.

All I can do is scratch my head at this point and hope some of this absorbs.

1246 GYIPE APRDGQAYVR L KDGEWVLLST FLGhhhhhhh

I did bing that difference (end portion of the 'Seattle' 6VXX_A Spike) and curiously the search engine points to a patent that has a vaguely similar sequence in it:

"The codons of CHA5 were optimized for expression by using human codons. As shown in Table 1, the original viral protease cleavage site PQRERRRKKRG (SEQ ID NO: 1) was mutated to PQRERG (SEQ ID NO: 2) in order to prevent proteins from the enzymatic cleavage to form HA1 and HA2. The transmembrane region (residues: 533-555) was replaced with the additional residues"

(SEQ ID NO: 3) LVPRGSPGSGYIPEAPRDGQAYVR KDGEWVLLSTFLGHHHHHH

"at the C terminus of the HA construct, where the thrombin cleavage site is in italics, the bacteriophage T4 fibritin foldon trimerization sequence is underlined" (GYIPEAPRDGQAYVRKDGEWVLLSTFLG), "and the His-tag is in bold (Stevens J, et al. (2006) Science 312:404-410)".

Thus is seems that the Seattle _A sequence has added the "bacteriophage T4 fibritin foldon trimerization sequence".

In summary, it seems that both the start and the tail of the Seattle strain has mystery additions, which is a total mystery to me at this point.

[–]infocom6502 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

bacteriophage T4 fibritin foldon trimerization sequence

So I'm still trying to figure this out, but one preliminary thought is that this S-protein might be a modified version, which forces the desired conformation of the spike (either 'open' or 'closed') to be used in vaccines.

(The original Spike might change conformation somewhat uncontrollably, so might not be best suited for S-protein based vaccine. )