25-year-old mother of three, Danni Coombs, who put off getting vaccinated, dies of COVID-19

submitted by ActuallyNot from (news.com.au)

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Murdered by ventilator.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Danni, who lived on Pennyland, had a known medical condition that sometimes affected her daily life and it is believed this caused the Covid to affect her more badly.

I'm not against the covid vaccine, I'm vaccinated myself, but the article implies a healthy young woman died of covid. A "noble lie."

[–]GST893 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

No Ivermectin in AUS?

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

In the UK?

They use it for treating parasites. Because that's what it does.

They're not using it for CoVID at the moment, afaik. Which is sensible, until it's shown to be helpful for that. There's is an ivermectin trial going on there. I predict it will show that ivermectin, as azithromycin and lopinavir and hydroxychloroquine before it, does nothing for COVID.

[–]GST893 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Yea, you're right it's way more sensible to inoculate people with an untested and unproven experimental gene therapy that carries significant and potentially deadly side effects instead of exploring the potential repurposing of an essential medicine that's been around for 40+ years with a stellar track record of safety and effectiveness. We wouldn't want a low cost, readily available and effective therapy getting in the way of big pharma's bottom line now would we?

https://m-jpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/m.jpost.com/health-science/israeli-scientist-says-covid-19-could-be-treated-for-under-1day-675612/amp

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yea, you're right it's way more sensible to inoculate people with an untested and unproven experimental gene therapy that carries significant and potentially deadly side effects instead of exploring the potential repurposing of an essential medicine that's been around for 40+ years with a stellar track record of safety and effectiveness. We wouldn't want a low cost, readily available and effective therapy getting in the way of big pharma's bottom line now would we?

https://m-jpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/m.jpost.com/health-science/israeli-scientist-says-covid-19-could-be-treated-for-under-1day-675612/amp

you cant talk sense to bots and paid shills.

[–]GST893 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I know, but its good to know that I'm not the only one who sees AN for what they are.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Who are AN?

Edit: Oh, you're talking about me.

You see me for what I "are".

  • You think mRNA is gene therapy.

  • You think vaccines that have gone through extensive phase one, phase two and phase three trials are "untested".

  • But you think Ivermectin is tested and "effective".

  • And you see AN for "what they are".

Bots aren't paid shills.

[–]GST893 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Who are AN? bleep bloop gpt3 I are AN! bleep bloop

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, for fuck's sake.

Do you think bot technology has increased to the point that they can pass the Turing test and follow a conversation through multiple posts?

Or do you think a paid shill would come here, where maybe ten people will read it?

Or do you know, as everyone else does, that those are both blatant bullshit, but you a desperate to avoid a conversation where you might have to face facts?

Which is it? I'm guessing the third.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which is it? I'm guessing the third.

its the 4th that i wasnt going to mention, but now that youre pressing the issue ill just state what everyone already knows: youre just a fucking moron.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yea, you're right

Yes.

it's way more sensible to inoculate people with an untested and unproven

The mRNA vaccines went through the same trials as any other vaccine.

experimental gene therapy

mRNA is not gene therapy. It doesn't get anywhere near your DNA. Don't be so fucking stupid. Everyone knows this.

that carries significant and potentially deadly side effects

Much less significant and deadly than COVID.

instead of exploring the potential repurposing of an essential medicine that's been around for 40+ years with a stellar track record of safety and effectiveness.

It does not have a track record of effectiveness against COVID. It has a track record of effectiveness against infection by worms and parasites. Mostly used in veterinarian context.

We wouldn't want a low cost, readily available and effective therapy getting in the way of big pharma's bottom line now would we?

Get the Johnson & Johnson vaccine or AstraZeneca if you wan't to buy off a producer that is not making a profit from the pandemic. I'd prefer the Pfizer or moderna, but it's your $17. If that's as significant to how much you value your life as it is to how much it is worth to society, take it into account.

https://m-jpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/m.jpost.com/health-science/israeli-scientist-says-covid-19-could-be-treated-for-under-1day-675612/amp

Ivermectin is unproven, and speculative against Covid. There's a pattern here. All you sociopaths trying to encourage people to get infected with COVID instead of getting a jab, claim there's some treatment. First azithromycin. It didn't do shit. Then lopinavir. It didn't do shit. Then hydroxychloroquine. It didn't do shit. Now ivermectin. You think this time's for reals?

You might be right, but the smart money is on "It doesn't do shit".

[–]GST893 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Garble garble repeat propaganda garble garble you wrong, only I know answers, I are AN. Is I are AN? Only government opinion is correct opinion! No other opinion is acceptable. *propaganda protocol 2 engaged garble garble

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not all opinions are equal. Some of them are wrong.

Such as ones that say that a mRNA vaccine is "Gene therapy".

I wouldn't classify that as a "government" opinion. It's more of a "knows what a gene is" opinion.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My evil ex SIL is in the hospital with Covid-19. We are hopeful she won't recover.